data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30b0f/30b0fd527bbf2c4dfd9b470f3fd3819624b73c22" alt="Nike run swift trail"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7554/a7554fec76012a2c66d99c179c15ebc2468aecae" alt="nike run swift trail nike run swift trail"
I love the outsole upgrades on the Pegasus Trail 2, the lugs are deeper and much more aggressive for tackling fast downhills and digging into the trails while climbing hills. Nike Pegasus Trail Rugged Outsole Grip A new rugged outsole performs better than the Pegasus 36 Trail I personally preferred the Zoom midsole and ‘lower drop feel’ of the Pegasus 36 Trail – but the Pegasus Trail 2 by no means feels bad, just different, and probably more tuned towards road runners who may prefer a more aggressive forward-leaning stance (which is something a high drop helps with).ħ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee8fb/ee8fbbdaaddb03d4ba00e5815298284893361b30" alt="nike run swift trail nike run swift trail"
I like the soft ride of this new midsole although I did notice more compression under the forefoot area which makes the 10mm drop feel more higher than the same 10mm drop of the Pegasus 36 Trail – I attribute this to there being more compression when striking down my forefoot during a stride which effectively gives less height in the front than the rear – making the drop seem more. React foam is more cushioned and softer than Zoom which was used on the Pegasus 36 Trail that came before it. Nike is now using React foam in the Pegasus Trail 2 Midsole. React Foam outsole is super cushioned and very durable The midsoles have plenty of cushioning in them too, and the material used is now React foam which certainly feels more plushy than the previous version of these shoes, the Peg 36 Trail.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1fed/f1fedf51e8962f93b76824a6a861df4a8ee2a787" alt="nike run swift trail nike run swift trail"
There’s really no danger in feeling any hot spots in these shoes because of these soft, foot conforming materials. The Pegasus Trail 2 is a really comfortable trail running shoe, and that’s right out the box – I attribute this to the very flexible and stretch-forming upper materials used. Drop a comment down below with the brand you normally run in and I’ll let you know how they fit relative to them too. They are also consistent with other brands like On Running, Adidas, and most Salomon trail running shoes. I can confirm that the Pegasus Trail 2 trail running shoes fit true to size and consistent with other Nike running shoes I have tested and reviewed here on. Starting with the important question of how the Pegasus Trail 2 fit. Nike Pegasus Trail 2 Fit, Features, and Key Specs. Nike Pegasus Trail 2 performance review.Pegasus Trail 2 Fit, Features, and Key Specs.Nike Pegasus Trail 2 Review: Table of Contents UPDATED PEGASUS: Nike Pegasus Trail 4 Review I think if you need a simple daily trainer or a value pair of sneakers for around town, the Run Swift 2 is worth a look.In this Nike Pegasus Trail 2 review I will be talking about all the innovations and features on the Peg Trail 2, how well they perform while running on the trails (and also the roads), how they compare to the Peg 36 Trail, whether they’re worth buying, and a review summary score out of 10 complete with my pros and cons. It’s more comfortable, and a bit more high-end feeling than say the Quest 4 or the Downshifter 11, and I like the classic, refined style better as well. Once again, like many other Nike budget shoes, there are no reflective elements on the Run Swift 2, meaning you need to be extra careful should you be out running after dark.Īt $70 I think there’s actually good value in this shoe. The upper is plenty breathable with its wide-mesh construction and even though it has a thick 9.0mm padded tongue, the shoe didn’t feel hot on my feet. This shoe is comfortable on pavement and mild dirt running paths, which is a nice element for a do-it-all style of shoe like this. The outsole also features 2.2mm lugs giving it extra grip on varied terrain. The full-rubber outsole is generously thick at 4.4mm (average outsoles are just 3.5mm), and the rubber is firm at 88.5HC on the durometer (compared to an average of 80.5HC), meaning the shoe should wear slowly and have plenty of life. The shoe seems well built with plenty of welded overlays on the upper to keep debris out and act as an added layer of protection against abrasion. The Run Swift 2 isn’t all that swift… At 10.3 ounces (291g) it’s more of a clunker than a light and nimble shoe built for speed.Īgain, I see this as more of a performance sneaker than a true running shoe because of the weight here. The flex was affected just 3% compared to the average shoe being 35.3% stiffer at cold temps. I actually think they look sweet and feel good enough to wear walking around in.Īnother positive is this shoe didn’t seem to stiffen up much in our freezer tests. Honestly, for me, it’s a bit dull and I wouldn’t want to run these for anything longer than a recreational jog, but where I so dig them is just as a town sneaker. Your browser does not support the video tag.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30b0f/30b0fd527bbf2c4dfd9b470f3fd3819624b73c22" alt="Nike run swift trail"